التخطي إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

### Given Below Are Two Statements, One Labelled As Assertion (A) and the other Labelled As Reason (R): Assertion (A): In Case of Shares Issued On Pro–Rata Basis

Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R): Assertion (A): In case of shares issued on Pro–rata basis, excess money received at the time of application can be utilised till allotment only. Reason (R): Company has to pay interest on calls in advance @12% p.a. for amount adjusted towards calls (if any). In the context of the above two statements, which of the following is correct? Codes:

(A) Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the explanation of working capital management.
(B) Both(A) and (R) are true and (R) is a correct explanation of (A).
(C) Both (A) and (R) are false.
(D) (A) is false, but (R) is true.

(B) Both(A) and (R) are true and (R) is a correct explanation of (A).

### Explain the Role of ‘Justice Party’ in Boycotting of Council Elections | bzziii.com

Arun and Vijay are partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 5:1.  Balance Sheet (Extract)  Liabilities Amount (Rs.) Assets Amount (Rs.) Machinery 40,000 If the value of machinery reflected in the balance sheet is overvalued by 33 1/3%, find out the value of Machinery to be shown in the new Balance Sheet:  (A) ₹ 44,000  (B) ₹48,000  (C) ₹ 32,000  (D) ₹30,000  SOLUTION (D) ₹30,000  Explanation: Machinery is overvalued Value by 33 1/3% of 40,000 Here, 33 1/3% as a fraction = \frac{33\frac{1}{3}}{100} Converting the mixed fraction to an improper fraction, we get = \frac{\frac{100}{3}}{100}  = 100/300 Simplifying this, we get = 100/300 = 1/3 = 100/300 of z = 40,000-z Because, 40,000 is overvalued Value, we will minus the real value from 40,000. = "100x"/"300" + "300z"/"300" = 40,000 = "400z"/"300" = 40,000 = 40,000 \times 300/400 = z ∴ z = 30,000 4 5